<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-anti-Americanismism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/</link>
	<description>An Irishman&#039;s blog about the English language.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of Language Blog Roundup 2012 &#124; Wordnik</title>
		<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/#comment-40497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best of Language Blog Roundup 2012 &#124; Wordnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stancarey.wordpress.com/?p=13343#comment-40497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] September saw some (unnecessary, we thought) anti-Americanisms. But luckily, Stan Carey and Robert Lane Greene had a thing or two to say about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September saw some (unnecessary, we thought) anti-Americanisms. But luckily, Stan Carey and Robert Lane Greene had a thing or two to say about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/#comment-35672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stancarey.wordpress.com/?p=13343#comment-35672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karen: No, it&#039;s commonly used for things that are just generally attractive, typically small or childlike or sentimentally appealing. So baby animals and children are often called cute, and the word can also be applied to buttons and buns and noses and clothes and yes, houses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen: No, it&#8217;s commonly used for things that are just generally attractive, typically small or childlike or sentimentally appealing. So baby animals and children are often called cute, and the word can also be applied to buttons and buns and noses and clothes and yes, houses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the ridger</title>
		<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/#comment-35630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the ridger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stancarey.wordpress.com/?p=13343#comment-35630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do British people really reserve &quot;cute&quot; for things they&#039;re sexually attracted to? This causes me to worry about all the &quot;cute house/flat&quot; ads I&#039;ve seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do British people really reserve &#8220;cute&#8221; for things they&#8217;re sexually attracted to? This causes me to worry about all the &#8220;cute house/flat&#8221; ads I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelida Kreer (@Nelida_Kreer)</title>
		<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/#comment-35435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelida Kreer (@Nelida_Kreer)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stancarey.wordpress.com/?p=13343#comment-35435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Second your motion, Claire! I&#039;d be rather nice-day-ed than drop-deaded, any day of the week... All these so-called Americanisms are formulaic, and an expression of social interrelations, why ascribe any darker or deeper meaning to them than what they are meant to be, a corteous greeting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second your motion, Claire! I&#8217;d be rather nice-day-ed than drop-deaded, any day of the week&#8230; All these so-called Americanisms are formulaic, and an expression of social interrelations, why ascribe any darker or deeper meaning to them than what they are meant to be, a corteous greeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week’s Language Blog Roundup: Banned Books Week, grammar wars, and more &#124; Wordnik</title>
		<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/#comment-35233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This Week’s Language Blog Roundup: Banned Books Week, grammar wars, and more &#124; Wordnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stancarey.wordpress.com/?p=13343#comment-35233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In British English versus American English, lexicographers galore explored Britishisms and the Britishization of American English, and Stan Carey discussed anti-anti-Americanism. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In British English versus American English, lexicographers galore explored Britishisms and the Britishization of American English, and Stan Carey discussed anti-anti-Americanism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/#comment-35075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stancarey.wordpress.com/?p=13343#comment-35075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill: I think one reason so many people object so strongly to &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; is the rather sudden increase in its use in several different ways. I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s any causal connection between its quotative use and what you call &quot;the modern version of &#039;uuuhhh&#039;&quot;, i.e., its use as a filler word or verbal tic. I&#039;d be interested in finding out how the various modern uses developed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill: I think one reason so many people object so strongly to <i>like</i> is the rather sudden increase in its use in several different ways. I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s any causal connection between its quotative use and what you call &#8220;the modern version of &#8216;uuuhhh&#8217;&#8221;, i.e., its use as a filler word or verbal tic. I&#8217;d be interested in finding out how the various modern uses developed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Stubblefield</title>
		<link>http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/anti-anti-americanismism/#comment-34995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Stubblefield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stancarey.wordpress.com/?p=13343#comment-34995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am an American--an old one.  The use of the quotative &quot;like&quot; irritates me as well.  Here is my theory (supported only by my musings):  When I was a child fifty to sixty years ago, we would introduce a new play scenario by &quot;Let&#039;s play like....&quot;  The beat generation and the hippies adopted it in a slightly mutated form &quot;Like, man.....&quot; At this stage, the GenXers and NexGens have transformed it into the modern version of &quot;uuuhhh.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an American&#8211;an old one.  The use of the quotative &#8220;like&#8221; irritates me as well.  Here is my theory (supported only by my musings):  When I was a child fifty to sixty years ago, we would introduce a new play scenario by &#8220;Let&#8217;s play like&#8230;.&#8221;  The beat generation and the hippies adopted it in a slightly mutated form &#8220;Like, man&#8230;..&#8221; At this stage, the GenXers and NexGens have transformed it into the modern version of &#8220;uuuhhh.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
