Some issues with ‘issues’

By the former I mean problems and by the latter I mean the use of issue as a widespread euphemism for problem, or as a vague abstraction that substitutes unhelpfully for clear thinking and straight talking.

When issue denotes a subject under debate or discussion, it is a convenient term, and there are certainly instances when it cannot beneficially be substituted by stronger and more concrete phrasing. That said, it seems to be widely overused and misused.

For example, instead of someone saying I dispute that or I have a problem with that, there is a tendency to soften the language: I have issues with that, I would have issues with that, There are issues surrounding that, and so on. These three examples are phrased in a way that distances the speaker or writer from their supposed opinion; consequently, their point (if they have one) loses force and clarity. My advice is to use the term sparingly and judiciously.

One Response to Some issues with ‘issues’

  1. […] Other alternatives listed have limited synonymity. Tough has significantly different connotations to robust, an initiative is not an idea, multi-disciplinary does not mean many, and a challenge is not necessarily a problem (neither is an issue). […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.