Less or fewer?

The BBC reports that Tesco is to change its checkout signs to read Up to 10 items, thereby sidestepping the problem of whether it should be 10 items or less or 10 items or fewer. Traditionally I was inclined to mentally amend the former to the latter, but I’ve learned that this ‘correction’ is controvertible.

Generally speaking the difference between fewer and less is like the difference between many and much: one is for stuff you can count, the other is for stuff you can’t or don’t count, e.g. many jobs but much work, fewer jobs but less work. In technical terms, fewer is used with “count nouns“, less with “mass nouns”. So one has fewer banknotes but less money, fewer troubles but less trouble (some nouns have a foot in both count and mass categories). Fewer refers to numbers of things; less refers to measurements or degrees of something.

That’s the general rule, but actual usage is not so simple. Some standard phrases go against the guideline (Write your answer in 100 words or less; He made one less mistake this time), while less is also used with mass nouns when the noun is measured in increments or fractions. Time, distance, money, statistical figures and mathematical amounts can be segmented this way, so one writes:

less than six months
five kilometres or less
less than €100
10 is less than 12½

An exception is when the noun is used in a way that emphasises its distinct units, rather than its fractional nature. One writes “fewer days’ maternity leave” because in this example the days are treated as indivisible blocks.

Merriam-Webster shows how Robert Baker’s mild preference for using fewer with count nouns, which he expressed in 1770, seems to have been subsequently set in stone as an absolute injunction against using less with count nouns. This injunction seems more arbitrary than sound. There are instances when fewer is preferred, but less is often fine when received wisdom says it’s anathema. Less has been used with count nouns for over a thousand years, so it’s about as standard as it gets. The ‘rule’ is a relative upstart.

If in doubt, try them both out – the human ear can be a good guide to usage. If you’re still not sure, there’s a fair chance that either usage is acceptable. Writing less where fewer would be more elegant – or more formal, where so desired – is not going to get you sent you to hell, and if you get sent to Tesco, you’ll be spared the dilemma at the checkout.

Update: If you remain unconvinced: Bill Walsh, Motivated Grammar, Mark Liberman, Bradshaw of the Future and Arrant Pedantry have written interesting posts on this strangely contentious subject.

5 Responses to Less or fewer?

  1. You could also say fewer than six months and five kilometres or fewer.

  2. Stan says:

    You could, but would you? The only context in which I would use those expressions is if months or kilometres were being treated as indivisible units, which they generally aren’t.

    If you replace the invisible word in each phrase, you get: fewer months than six months, which allows only for whole numbers of months, or less time than six months, which allows for any amount of time under six months. Similarly, five kilometres or fewer kilometres or five kilometres or less distance.

  3. That’s an interesting duality. Months are divisible and indivisible at the same time. You’ve developed a quantum theory of language.

  4. Stan says:

    ‘Months are divisible and indivisible at the same time’

    Heh. Indeed they are. Robert Anton Wilson said something to the effect that Irish people take to quantum theory because the conditional tense is so embedded in our speech. All those woulds program us for universal uncertainty.

  5. […] For more on the difference between less and fewer, see this post. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s