Fixer-upper(er) and funnerer reduplication

My recent post on ludic language has prompted me to dig up and rework some old notes on playful reduplication in English. I’ll begin with a short comic verse by author and editor William Rossa Cole:

I thought I’d win the spelling bee

And get right to the top,

But I started to spell ‘banana,’

And I didn’t know when to stop.

The poem’s title, ‘Banananananananana’, as well as underlining the joke draws our attention to how unusual a spelling banana is. Once you start the string of alternating a’s and n’s that constitute the bulk of the word, it’s easy to imagine absent-mindedly overshooting the mark, stuck in a groove like Langton’s Ant on its endless highway.

English has several types of reduplication, including repeating, ablaut, rhyming, and contrastive focus. Most of the examples in those links are part of everyday English, but banananananananana is decidedly outside the standard language. (The same of course can be said for many nonsense pop lyrics: Sha la la la la, Da do ron ron ron, Do be do be do.)

Another kind of playful reduplication occurs in certain agentive compounds like finder-outerer and turner backerer (Google them for examples). But we should look first at the slightly more normal finder-outer and turner backer types, which pattern I’ll call X-er-Y-er. Even these occupy a grey area, since their morphology is neither uniform nor fully standardised.

When we inflect a verb to turn an action into its doer, one –er (or other suffix*) is normally enough: teach → teacherspeak → speaker, and so on. With more complex verb phrases that include a particle it’s more awkward. If someone paints a room, they’re a painter, but if they do up the room are they a do-upper, a doer-up, a doer-upper, or what?

The last style, doer-upper (X-er-Y-er), despite the seeming surfeit of suffixes, is generally preferred in current usage. A common example of this ‘double agentive’ is fixer-upper, which usually means a house in need of fixing up but can also refer to the person who does the fixing up. Another one I saw recently is leaflet giver-outers, which my friend Ultan wrote about in Madrid.

Ben Zimmer looked at this issue in a recent article for the Wall Street Journal, writing about an ‘opt-out’ movement in the US – parents who are unhappy with the standardised state exams set for their children are opting out. So are they opt-outers, opters-out, or opter-outers?

Legal experts may have been the first to grapple with this thorny bit of morphology, in references to people who opt out of class-action lawsuits. A search on the LexisNexis database reveals that all three of these alternatives are attested in case law, though the preferred term, dating back to 1968, is “opters-out.”

The use of “opters-out” follows the traditional pattern of words like “passers-by” or “hangers-on.” Adding “-er” to both parts to create “opter-outer” is a newer innovation, but one that has been popularized by such terms as “fixer-upper” for a house in need of repairs, or the tagline for Bounty paper towels, “the quicker picker-upper.”

The testing dissidents, for their part, are mostly opting for “opt-outer”—likely because “opt-out” has become such a fixed expression, and “-er” just gets tacked on to the end.

Obviously there is plenty of variation, and the patterns preferred are likely to vary for different compounds and in different speech communities; rhythm and rhyme may play a part in the choice. X-er-Y-er predominates nowadays, with the more traditional X-er-Y style losing ground. This is confirmed by research reported at Literal-Minded by Neal Whitman, who also notes some remarkably extended complex phrases, such as putter-upper-wither (one who puts up with).

And what are we to make of fixer-upperer, with yet another –er added? Lady Demelza, an Australian reader, emailed me with this form of reduplication she has come across in ‘Strine’ (a phonetic rendering of Australian [English]). She writes, ‘Strine will often double the –er suffix of an agent noun to –erer. This most commonly happens with compound and hyphenated words or phrases.’

Demelza offers as examples fixer-upperer and keeper-in-toucherer. Looking into their distribution online, she found fixer-upperer used pretty much exclusively by Australian speakers. This entry on the reduplicative –erer suffix in an online slang dictionary also offers hanger-onerer, sorter-outerer, and washer-upperer, all following the same extravagant pattern.

The suffixation in these phrases, being multiply superfluous, is almost like a metalinguistic joke showing people you know there’s something odd about fixer-upper, so why not double down on the suffixation, or in this case triple down, because it’s funner. Funnerer.

bounty ad quicker thicker picker upper

A reduplication similar to banananananananana that I’ve noticed in my own speech is theseses or theseseses, as a jocular plural of thesis. (I edit a lot of these theses.) Something about the standard plural theses /ˈθiːsiːz/, with its ‘ees-eez’ near-reduplication, just makes me want to keep it going a bit. I saw a similar one in Robert Bernen’s book Tales from the Blue Stacks, set in northwest Ireland:

‘A dog that kills to suck the blood is not like another that tears the sheep and leaves them. That one will go out in twoses and threeses, and always to another place, but this un’ll go always alone.’

Which in turn brings to mind Moses’ toeses and the Tolkien character Gollum’s birdses and hobbitses rather than birds and hobbits.

What other examples can you think of? And have you noticed what patterns you prefer for fixer-upper-type phrases, or does it depend on the stress or other factors?

Updates:

A few more from Twitter:

And one I just read in Hair of the Dogma by Myles na Gopaleen (aka Flann O’Brien):

Is it old age or sentimentimentality? never mind that last word – the typewriter keeps on commenting, and can now and again invent a beautiful and unextinguishable word like ‘endored’. I leave it.

Donal Ryan’s novel The Thing About December has a couple of nice examples. Masterses (i.e., Master’s theses):

Granted, he was no great prize of a chap; he had never given her any reason to be below in the Post Office boasting about him like some women who would talk out loud in the queue for fear anyone would not accidentally overhear about their sons who were doing Masterses, or just finishing their accountancy exams . . .

And ladder-faller-offer (someone who fell off a ladder):

Johnsey wasn’t fond of this new development: he didn’t want to share the Lovely Voice’s attentions with this clumsy ladder-faller-offer.

A.O.D. Claxton’s Suffolk Dialect of the 20th Century includes a note on a reduplicative feature of that variety of English:

A kind of double plural is sometimes used, particularly when referring to small numbers
Examples:—

“Count em out in twoes and threeses.”

“He wear nineses boots.”

“Fowerses and Elevenses (meals).” . . .

In the comparative and superlative forms of adjectives a kind of additional octave is frequently added to the scale of degrees, e.g. ‘lesserer,’ ‘lessest of all’, ‘worser’, ‘worsest,’ ‘most worsest’, ‘the leastest little thing’. [comma placement as in the original]

*

* Specifically an agentive nominaliser.

23 Responses to Fixer-upper(er) and funnerer reduplication

  1. Chips Mackinolty says:

    Slightly off subject, but one of my favourite graffiti, with an example of reduplication:

    To do is to be
    J S Mill

    To be is to do
    J P Sartre

    Do be do be do
    F A Sinatra

  2. stuartnz says:

    “Looking into their distribution online, she found fixer-upperer used pretty much exclusively by Australian speakers.” Probably too a small a sample size to even register, but this would be standard on the non-penal side of the Tasman too.

    • Stan Carey says:

      Thanks, Stuart. I didn’t get a chance to look into the geographical or dialectal distribution of -erer usage, so it’s helpful to have its NZ occurrence confirmed. It may have modest use elsewhere too.

  3. John Cowan says:

    In Murder Must Advertise, Miss Meteyard says “I only wish people would send me fifty poundses in registered envelopes”, meaning in context “sums of £50”. The Gutenberg Canada edition notes that they have corrected “poundses” to “pounds”, however! I have written to them.

  4. astraya says:

    At one point in my life one of my sisters was married and was living with her husband, and I would talk about visiting “my sisters’ house”. The other two were unmarried and were sharing a house together, and I would talk about visiting “my sisters’s house”.

  5. Nancy Friedman says:

    In 2013, when Google pulled the plug on Google Reader, a competitor advertised its service with a pitch that began, “Hey there Google Readerer.” I blogged about it, and Ben Zimmer noted in a comment that linguists “sometimes refer someone who participates in a phonological merger as a mergerer.” http://nancyfriedman.typepad.com/away_with_words/2013/03/one-who-readers.html

    • Stan Carey says:

      Thanks for reminding me of this post, Nancy, and of Readerer and mergerer, both excellent examples. The BuzzFeed style guide recently tweeted about Spoilerer as a term for someone providing spoilers of a film, book, etc., and wondered if it should be added to the guide or considered an abomination. Unable to resist the morphological excess, I replied: Only a spoilererer would spoil this splendid mutant.

  6. bevrowe says:

    On the more general topic of reduplication in English, does anyone know of any exceptions to Jespersen’s rule that in words formed like “hip-hop” and “singsong”, the first vowel is always “i”?
    “See-saw” is almost an exception but has no following consonant so cannot be quite regular.

  7. wisewebwoman says:

    An almost unconscious thing I do I when I see the ubiquitous Walmart Ad: “Save Money. Live Betterererer” as it has never made sense to me (Better than what, who?).
    XO
    WWW

  8. Dawn in NL says:

    I have 2 personal reduplications: probababably and phenomenonenon. They just sound/feel good that way.

  9. Bloix@bloix.com says:

    Winnie the Pooh used to take elevenses.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s